As Product Owner, your responsibility is to order the Product Backlog by Value.
This may be really difficult when you're dealing with many different stakeholders who all consider their own few backlog items to be of utmost importance.
This simple model can guide your questions:
Three Importance Dimensions
The three dimensions Need, Want and Lack are all gradual - yet, for simplicity purposes, we'll just simplify them as "Strong" (inside the dotted circle), "Relevant" (within the dimension circle, but outside the dotted circle) and "Weak" (outside the dimension's circle). We'll leave it up to common sense how to interpret these terms.
As a nuance, you can rank-order them by proximity to the center.
How strong is the need?Based on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, some features meet existential needs, others provide comfort or enjoyment. Arguably, you need to be in a pretty comfortable positon to value convenience.
Which basic needs gets addressed?
What happens when no solution is provided?
Will there be loss of life, damage, squandered opportunity or merely inconvenience?
The bigger the need, the closer you would move to the center inersection.
How wanted is the feature?Many features are highly wanted for a really short time, but like a snowflake, the demand melts off as fast as it appeared.
Is the request just a spontaneous idea?
Has it been thoroughly pondered?
How much would you be willing to sacrifice to get it?
When customers are unwilling to sacrifice anything, not even a single cent, then it's not wanted - and if they'd sacrifice everything else get it, then it's really wanted.
How big is the lack?Supply creates its own demand, but scarcity rules price.
As the old joke goes, a great salesman could sell sand in the desert - but that would be an utter waste of sales talent.
How is the situation currently addressed?
Is a feasible solution already available?
How much better would that which we could provide be than status quo?
The more plentiful and cheaper available alternatives are, the smaller the lack - and the more costly an alternative is, the bigger the lack.
Ordering the backlog
The position of these items in our diagram can then be used to determine how we would arrange our backlog:
- Items in the central intersect of the diagram have highest importance and should come first. In this case, the exact order might be determined by other factors, such as WSJF or feasiblity.
- Items in dual intersects within the dotted circle will end up near the top of the backlog.
- Items in dual intersects outside the dotted circle will end up somewhere in the middle of the backlog.
- Items which are only in one circle can be deferred and moved to the bottom of the backlog.
- Items placed outside all circles warrant no further consideration and can be safely discarded.
Standard relevance"But ... what about items with relevant need, lack and want, where neither is strong? They fit nowhere in the diagram"
Yes, the model doesn't really allow you to place them properly.
Just ignore the "Want" dimension and put them into a suitable dual intersect. It doesn't matter - because these items won't be on the top of the backlog, and the exact order of backlog items that won't be touched within the next couple of months is fairly irrelevant.